Extraterrestrial Probes

Interesting article asking the questions about UAPs being ET probes. If this is the case and you are going to open the door that ET (at least its technology) might be an avenue worth exploring, as the Kirkpatrick/Loeb paper suggests, then we are faced with a larger question. It might explain the UAP phenomenon back to 2004, but if you look at the phenomenon going back to 1947, we had other craft that were less like probes and more like piloted craft. How do we explain the history. Assuming, of course, that ET is the explanation and this is not something else, such as natural phenomena.

  1. These have always been probes. Saucer things never existed. Result of misidentification, hoaxes, or psychosis.
  2. ET first arrived in craft and then sent probes to monitor.
  3. Different species of ET. Some in craft and some sent probes.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Share:

More Posts

High Strangeness

A podcast that delves deeply into the bizarre nature of the phenomenon. Based on a 2003 article by Vallee and Davis. Very good and worth listening

DOD IG Reports on UAP

Here is the DOD Inspector General’s report. https://media.defense.gov/2024/Jan/25/2003381266/-1/-1/1/UNCLASSIFIED%20SUMMARY_UNIDENTIFIED%20ANOMALOUS%20PHENOMENA%20SECURE.PDF Also, the DOD IG recently released to the Black Vault a transcript of its conversation with David

Pais’s Patents and Patent Law

Article on various motivations for Pais’s patents. Salvatore Pais’s Mysterious ‘UFO patents’: What Do They Really Mean? – The Debrief